RT-PCR genotyping assays to identify SARS-CoV-2 variants in England in 2021: a design and retrospective evaluation study.

BACKGROUND: Whole-genome sequencing (WGS) is the gold standard diagnostic tool to identify and genetically characterise emerging pathogen mutations (variants), but cost, capacity, and timeliness limit its use when large populations need rapidly assessing. We assessed the potential of genotyping assays to provide accurate and timely variant information at scale by retrospectively examining surveillance for SARS-CoV-2 variants in England between March and September, 2021, when genotyping assays were used widely for variant detection. METHODS: We chose a panel of four RT-PCR genotyping assays to detect circulating variants of SARS-COV-2 in England and developed a decision algorithm to assign a probable SARS-CoV-2 variant to samples using the assay results. We extracted surveillance data from the UK Health Security Agency databases for 115 934 SARS-CoV-2-positive samples (March 1-Sept 6, 2021) when variant information was available from both genotyping and WGS. By comparing the genotyping and WGS variant result, we calculated accuracy metrics (ie, sensitivity, specificity, and positive predictive value [PPV]) and the time difference between the sample collection date and the availability of variant information. We assessed the number of samples with a variant assigned from genotyping or WGS, or both, over time. FINDINGS: Genotyping and an initial decision algorithm (April 10-May 11, 2021 data) were accurate for key variant assignment: sensitivities and PPVs were 0·99 (95% CI 0·99-0·99) for the alpha, 1·00 (1·00-1·00) for the beta, and 0·91 (0·80-1·00) for the gamma variants; specificities were 0·97 (0·96-0·98), 1·00 (1·00-1·00), and 1·00 (1·00-1·00), respectively. A subsequent decision algorithm over a longer time period (May 27-Sept 6, 2021 data) remained accurate for key variant assignment: sensitivities were 0·91 (95% CI 0·74-1·00) for the beta, 0·98 (0·98-0·99) for the delta, and 0·93 (0·81-1·00) for the gamma variants; specificities were 1·00 (1·00-1·00), 0·96 (0·96-0·97), and 1·00 (1·00-1·00), respectively; and PPVs were 0·83 (0·62-1·00), 1·00 (1·00-1·00), and 0·78 (0·59-0·97), respectively. Genotyping produced variant information a median of 3 days (IQR 2-4) after the sample collection date, which was faster than with WGS (9 days [8-11]). The flexibility of genotyping enabled a nine-times increase in the quantity of samples tested for variants by this method (from 5000 to 45 000). INTERPRETATION: RT-PCR genotyping assays are suitable for high-throughput variant surveillance and could complement WGS, enabling larger scale testing for known variants and timelier results, with important implications for effective public health responses and disease control globally, especially in settings with low WGS capacity. However, the choice of panels of RT-PCR assays is highly dependent on database information on circulating variants generated by WGS, which could limit the use of genotyping assays when new variants are emerging and spreading rapidly. FUNDING: UK Health Security Agency and National Institute for Health Research Health Protection Research Unit in Emergency Preparedness and Response.

Comparison of analytical performance and economic value of two biosurveillance methods for tracking SARS-COV-2 variants of concern.

The development of biosurveillance programs with strong analytical performance and economically accessible protocols is essential for monitoring viral pathogens. Throughout the COVID-19 pandemic, whole-genome sequencing (WGS) has been the prevailing technology for SARS-CoV-2 variant of concern (VOC) detection. While WGS offers benefits, it is a lengthy process, financially and technically straining for scalable viral tracking. The aim of this study was to compare the analytical performance and economic feasibility of WGS and PCR mutation panels for distinguishing six known VOCs: Alpha (B.1.1.7 and Q.4), Gamma (P.1), Delta (B.1.617.2 and AY.4.2), and Omicron. (B.1.1.529.1). In all, 78 SARS-CoV-2-positive samples were collected from April to December 2021 at Northeastern University (Cabot Testing Site, Boston, MA, USA) for genotyping PCR and WGS analysis. MagMax Viral/Pathogen II Nucleic Acid Isolation and TaqPath COVID-19 Combo Kits were used for RNA extraction and SARS-CoV-2 confirmation. VOC discrimination was assessed using two TaqMan SARS-CoV-2 single nucleotide polymorphism (SNP) assay layouts, and Ion Torrent WGS. In November 2021, the mutation panel demonstrated marked versatility by detecting the emerging Omicron variant reported by South Africa. SNP panel analysis yielded the following 78 VOC identifications: Alpha B.1.1.7 (N = 20), Alpha Q.4 (N = 3), Gamma P.1 (N = 1), Delta B.1.617.2 (N = 30), Delta AY.4.2 (N = 3), and Omicron B.1.1.529.1 (N = 20) with one undetermined (N = 1) sample. Genotyping mutation panels designated lineages in 77 of 78 samples, 46/78 were confirmed by WGS, while 32 samples failed WGS lineage assignment. RT-PCR genotyping panels offer pronounced throughput and sensitivity and provide an economically advantageous technique for SARS-CoV-2 biosurveillance.IMPORTANCEThe results presented in our manuscript demonstrate how the value of simplistic and reliable molecular assays coupled with the core scientific principle of standardization can be overlooked by the charm of more sophisticated assays and instrumentation. This effect can often be amplified during tumultuous public health events, such as the COVID-19 pandemic. By adapting standardized PCR mutation panels to detect prominently circulating SARS-CoV-2 variants, we were able to better assess the potential health impacts of rising positivity rates and transmission clusters within the Northeastern University population. While several literature publications utilizing genotyping PCR and NGS have a similar scope to ours, many investigations lack sufficiently standardized genotyping PCR and NGS bioinformatics inclusionary/exclusionary criteria for SARS-CoV-2 variant identification. Finally, the economic benefits of standardized PCR mutation panels would allow for global implementation of biosurveillance, rather than reserving biosurveillance to more economically developed nations.

Clinical performance evaluation of TAQPATH Enteric Bacterial Select Panel for the detection of common enteric bacterial pathogens in comparison to routine stool culture and other qPCR-based diagnostic tests.

IMPORTANCE: Enteric bacterial infections caused by Salmonella, Shigella, pathogenic Escherichia coli, and Campylobacter represent one of the most common causes of infectious enteritis worldwide. The timely and accurate diagnosis of pathogens causing gastroenteritis is crucial for patient care, public health, and disease surveillance. While stool culture has long been the standard and highly specific method for detecting enteric pathogens, it is labor-intensive and time-consuming with limited sensitivity. To improve patient outcomes, there is a need to implement new cost-effective approaches for the detection of bacterial enteric pathogens with higher sensitivity and faster time to result. This study shows that multiplex real-time polymerase chain reaction-based tests, such as the TAQPATH Enteric Bacterial Select Panel, are accurate and cost-effective diagnostic alternatives for the detection and differentiation of the most common enteric bacterial pathogens, offering quicker time to result and higher sensitivity compared to routine stool culture.

Efficient SARS-CoV-2 Surveillance during the Pandemic-Endemic Transition Using PCR-Based Genotyping Assays.

Severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus-2 (SARS-CoV-2) variants of concern (VOC) pose an increased risk to public health due to higher transmissibility and/or immune escape. In this study, we assessed the performance of a custom TaqMan SARS-CoV-2 mutation panel consisting of 10 selected real-time PCR (RT-PCR) genotyping assays compared to whole-genome sequencing (WGS) for identification of 5 VOC circulating in The Netherlands. SARS-CoV-2 positive samples (N = 664), collected during routine PCR screening (15 ≤ CT ≤ 32) between May-July 2021 and December 2021-January 2022, were selected and analyzed using the RT-PCR genotyping assays. VOC lineage was determined based on the detected mutation profile. In parallel, all samples underwent WGS with the Ion AmpliSeq SARS-CoV-2 research panel. Among 664 SARS-CoV-2 positive samples, the RT-PCR genotyping assays classified 31.2% as Alpha (N = 207); 48.9% as Delta (N = 325); 19.4% as Omicron (N = 129), 0.3% as Beta (N = 2), and 1 sample as a non-VOC. Matching results were obtained using WGS in 100% of the samples. RT-PCR genotyping assays enable accurate detection of SARS-CoV-2 VOC. Furthermore, they are easily implementable, and the costs and turnaround time are significantly reduced compared to WGS. For this reason, a higher proportion of SARS-CoV-2 positive cases in the VOC surveillance testing can be included, while reserving valuable WGS resources for identification of new variants. Therefore, RT-PCR genotyping assays would be a powerful method to include in SARS-CoV-2 surveillance testing. IMPORTANCE The severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus-2 (SARS-CoV-2) genome changes constantly. It is estimated that there are thousands of variants of SARS-CoV-2 by now. Some of those variants, variants of concern (VOC), pose an increased risk to public health due to higher transmissibility and/or immune escape. Pathogen surveillance helps researchers, epidemiologists, and public health officials to monitor the evolution of infectious diseases agents, alert on the spread of pathogens, and develop counter measures like vaccines. The technique used for the pathogen surveillance is called sequence analysis which makes it possible to examine the building blocks of SARS-CoV-2. In this study, a new PCR method based on the detection of specific changes of those building blocks is presented. This method enables a fast, accurate and cheap determination of different SARS-CoV-2 VOC. Therefore, it would be a powerful method to include in SARS-CoV-2 surveillance testing.

One assay to test them all: Multiplex assays for expansion of respiratory virus surveillance.

Molecular multiplex assays (MPAs) for simultaneous detection of severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2), influenza and respiratory syncytial virus (RSV) in a single RT-PCR reaction reduce time and increase efficiency to identify multiple pathogens with overlapping clinical presentation but different treatments or public health implications. Clinical performance of XpertXpress® SARS-CoV-2/Flu/RSV (Cepheid, GX), TaqPath™ COVID-19, FluA/B, RSV Combo kit (Thermo Fisher Scientific, TP), and PowerChek™ SARS-CoV-2/Influenza A&B/RSV Multiplex RT-PCR kit II (KogeneBiotech, PC) was compared to individual Standards of Care (SoC). Thirteen isolates of SARS-CoV-2, human seasonal influenza, and avian influenza served to assess limit of detection (LoD). Then, positive and negative residual nasopharyngeal specimens, collected under public health surveillance and pandemic response served for evaluation. Subsequently, comparison of effectiveness was assessed. The three MPAs confidently detect all lineages of SARS-CoV-2 and influenza viruses. MPA-LoDs vary from 1 to 2 Log10 differences from SoC depending on assay and strain. Clinical evaluation resulted in overall agreement between 97 and 100%, demonstrating a high accuracy to detect all targets. Existing differences in costs, testing burden and implementation constraints influence the choice in primary or community settings. TP, PC and GX, reliably detect SARS-CoV-2, influenza and RSV simultaneously, with reduced time-to-results and simplified workflows. MPAs have the potential to enhance diagnostics, surveillance system, and epidemic response to drive policy on prevention and control of viral respiratory infections.

ONE ASSAY TO TEST THEM ALL: COMPARING MULTIPLEX ASSAYS FOR EXPANSION OF RESPIRATORY VIRUS SURVEILLANCE.

Background: Molecular multiplex assays (MPAs) for simultaneous detection of severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2), influenza and respiratory syncytial virus (RSV) in a single RT-PCR reaction reduce time and increase efficiency to identify multiple pathogens with overlapping clinical presentation but different treatments or public health implications. Methods: Clinical performance of XpertXpress ® SARS-CoV-2/Flu/RSV (Cepheid, GX), TaqPath™ COVID-19, FluA/B, RSV Combo kit (Thermo Fisher Scientific, TP), and PowerChek™ SARS-CoV-2/Influenza A&B/RSV Multiplex RT-PCR kit II (KogeneBiotech, PC) was compared to individual Standards of Care (SoC). Thirteen isolates of SARS-CoV-2, human seasonal influenza, and avian influenza served to assess limit of detection (LoD). Then, positive and negative residual nasopharyngeal specimens, collected under public health surveillance and pandemic response served for evaluation. Subsequently, comparison of effectiveness was assessed. Results: The three MPAs confidently detect all lineages of SARS-CoV-2 and influenza viruses. MPA-LoDs vary from 1-2 Log10 differences from SoC depending on assay and strain. Clinical evaluation resulted in overall agreement between 97% and 100%, demonstrating a high accuracy to detect all targets. Existing differences in costs, testing burden and implementation constraints influence the choice in primary or community settings. Conclusion: TP, PC and GX, reliably detect SARS-CoV-2, influenza and RSV simultaneously, with reduced time-to-results and simplified workflows. MPAs have the potential to enhancediagnostics, surveillance system, and epidemic response to drive policy on prevention and control of viral respiratory infections. IMPORTANCE: Viral respiratory infections represent a major burden globally, weighed down by the COVID-19 pandemic, and threatened by spillover of novel zoonotic influenza viruses. Since respiratory infections share clinical presentations, identification of the causing agent for patient care and public health measures requires laboratory testing for several pathogens, including potential zoonotic spillovers. Simultaneous detection of SARS-CoV-2, influenza, and RSV in a single RT-PCR accelerates time from sampling to diagnosis, preserve consumables, and streamline human resources to respond to other endemic or emerging pathogens. Multiplex assays have the potential to sustain and even expand surveillance systems, can utilize capacity/capability developed during the COVID-19 pandemic worldwide, thereby strengthening epidemic/pandemic preparedness, prevention, and response.

SARS-CoV-2 variants of concern surveillance including Omicron using RT-PCR-based genotyping offers comparable performance to whole genome sequencing.

Known SARS-CoV-2 variants of concern (VOCs) can be detected and differentiated using an RT-PCR-based genotyping approach, which offers quicker time to result, lower cost, higher flexibility, and use of the same laboratory instrumentation for detection of SARS-CoV-2 when compared with whole genome sequencing (WGS). In the current study, we demonstrate how we applied a genotyping approach for identification of all VOCs and that such technique can offer comparable performance to WGS for identification of known SARS-CoV-2 VOCs, including more recent strains, Omicron BA.1 and BA.2.

Clinical Performance of Direct RT-PCR Testing of Raw Saliva for Detection of SARS-CoV-2 in Symptomatic and Asymptomatic Individuals.

RT-PCR tests based on RNA extraction from nasopharyngeal swabs (NPS) are promoted as the "gold standard" for SARS-CoV-2 detection. However, the use of saliva samples offers noninvasive self-collection more suitable for high-throughput testing. This study evaluated performance of the TaqPath COVID-19 Fast PCR Combo kit 2.0 assay for detection of SARS-CoV-2 in raw saliva relative to a lab-developed direct RT-PCR test (SalivaDirect-based PCR, SDB-PCR) and an RT-PCR test based on RNA extraction from NPS. Saliva and NPS samples were collected from symptomatic and asymptomatic individuals (N = 615). Saliva samples were tested for SARS-CoV-2 using the TaqPath COVID-19 Fast PCR Combo kit 2.0 and the SDB-PCR, while NPS samples were tested by RT-PCR in RNA extracts according to the Irish national testing system. TaqPath COVID-19 Fast PCR Combo kit 2.0 detected SARS-CoV-2 in 52 saliva samples, of which 51 were also positive with the SDB-PCR. Compared to the NPS "gold standard" biospecimen method, 49 samples displayed concordant results, while three samples (35